Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Communication Inquiry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huntemann, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Corporate Interference: The Commercialization and Concentration of Radio Post the 1996 Telecommunications Act

Nina Huntemann

Since the 1996 Telecommunication Act was signed by President Clinton, the U.S. commercial radio industry has undergone unprecedented merger activity. The Federal Communications Commission reports that in the first year of the act, 20 percent of the commercial radio stations in the country changed owners. The result is a highly concentrated industry with the top ten radio groups controlling 821 stations, 320 of which are owned by one firm. The author investigates the impact of the act on the radio industry with particular attention paid to the effects of radio consolidation on minority ownership, programming diversity, and community radio. Preliminary research indicates a fast decline in local music and news and diverse programming since the consolidation frenzy. Advertising dollars and economies of scale rule the bottom line of large radio groups. As a result, formats attracting high-consumption demographics are replacing formats that appeal to working-class, urban, and nonwhite audiences.

Journal of Communication Inquiry, Vol. 23, No. 4, 390-407 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0196859999023004006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?