Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Communication Inquiry
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinter, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Public Sphere and History: Historians’ Response to Habermas on the "Worth" of the Past

Andrej Pinter

This article deals with contested links between the public sphere and history. In particular, it presents a challenge faced by cultural, social, and political historians to use history in clarifying the Habermasian notion of the public sphere. According to the early theory of Jürgen Habermas, history is a necessary ingredient of theoretical conceptualization of the public sphere. Recent research into the history of the public sphere questioned some interpretations of facts on which Habermas based his early theory, but emerging historians’perspectives on the nexus between history and theory of the public sphere uncovered other problems. The role of history in building theories of the public sphere is one such issue. In his later work, Habermas evaded this problem. This article also addresses a third aspect of the problem, which is developed within the history of communication. From this perspective, the history of the public sphere appears much more diverse, dynamic, and ambiguous. According to this position, history appears instrumental in preserving the plurality of possibilities and alternative intellectual routes.

Key Words: public sphere • history • Habermas • critical theory • historians of communication

Journal of Communication Inquiry, Vol. 28, No. 3, 217-232 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0196859904266499


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?