This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Petersen, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Portrayal of Research into Genetic-Based Differences of Sex and Sexual Orientation: A Study of "Popular" Science Journals, 1980 to 1997

Genetic explanations of human differences became increasingly popular in the 1980s and 1990s. Unfortunately, there has been relatively little analysis of how the media portray the findings of genetic research and how this is likely to affect the public's perceptions of genetics and people's responses to those who are defined as genetically different. This study is based on a discourse analysis of articles reporting research on genetic-based differences of sex and sexual orientation that appeared in a selection of "popular" (i.e., mass circulation) science journals published between 1980 and 1997. The study uncovered a number of enduring images of genetic research and genetic differences that underlie shifts in research foci evident during this period. The article discusses the nature of these images and implicit gender and heterosexist biases and argues the case for further analysis of how the media portrays genetic difference.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Dingwall and M. Aldridge Television wildlife programming as a source of popular scientific information: a case study of evolution Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 131 - 152. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. R. Bates Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2005; 14(1): 47 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. M. Bubela and T. A. Caulfield Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 27, 2004; 170(9): 1399 - 1407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Petersen Research on Men and Masculinities: Some Implications of Recent Theory for Future Work Men and Masculinities, July 1, 2003; 6(1): 54 - 69. [Abstract] [PDF]